Meta's Muse launch was supposed to be the biggest marketing play of the month.
A 3-week-old startup beat it.
Muse is Meta's first real AI agent. To launch it, they paid every major AI influencer to post on the same day. For 24 hours it was impossible to open your phone without seeing it.
That part worked. Influencer campaigns get people to try a product.
They rarely get anyone to stay.
A week later the buzz has faded. I've barely seen Muse mentioned since.
Instinct did the opposite. It's also an AI agent, but it lives in iMessage and runs errands for me. Three weeks after launch, the buzz is still as strong as day one. I'm using it daily and it keeps coming up in conversations.
The difference isn't budget. Meta has an unlimited one. The difference is what the product does after the campaign ends.
Link in the comments.
#B2BMarketing#ContentStrategy…more
Meta's Muse launch was supposed to be the biggest marketing play of the month.
But a 3 week old startup beat it.
Muse is Meta's first real AI agent. To launch it, they paid every big AI influencer to post about it on the same day.
For 24 hours it was impossible to open your phone without seeing it.
That part worked, sort of. Influencer campaigns get people to try a product.
But they rarely get anyone to stay.
A week later, the buzz has faded and I've barely seen Muse mentioned since.
Instinct did the opposite.
It's also an AI agent, but it lives in iMessage and runs errands for me.
3 weeks later after their launch, the buzz is still big as every.
I'm still using it daily, and it keeps coming up in conversations.
The Instinct play is the one a normal B2B brand can actually copy.
Meta's Muse launch was supposed to be the biggest marketing play of the month.
A 3-week-old startup beat it.
Muse is Meta's first real AI agent. To launch it, they paid every major AI influencer to post on the same day. For 24 hours it was impossible to open your phone without seeing it.
That part worked. Influencer campaigns get people to try a product.
They rarely get anyone to stay.
A week later the buzz has faded. I've barely seen Muse mentioned since.
Instinct did the opposite. It's also an AI agent, but it lives in iMessage and runs errands for me. Three weeks after launch, the buzz is still as strong as day one. I'm using it daily and it keeps coming up in conversations.
The difference isn't budget. Meta has an unlimited one. The difference is what the product does after the campaign ends.
#B2BMarketing#ContentStrategy
Founder at Radi8 // Executive Coach // Host of the Inspiring Founders Podcast
· LinkedIn
·
Your first clients came easy. That's exactly why the next ones feel impossible.
When you went independent, the phone rang. A former colleague needed help. Someone who'd watched you work for years passed your name along. Within a few months you had your first handful of clients, and it felt like proof the whole thing would work.
Here's what actually happened. You didn't build a way to win clients. You cashed in years of goodwill, all at once. Every person who'd seen you deliver inside the org, every bit of trust you'd earned over a career, converted into work the moment you were available to hire.
That's a stockpile, not a pipeline. A stock is finite. It draws down. You spend it faster than you notice, because it arrived without any effort you could repeat. When it runs low, there's nothing underneath to refill it. The well was full the day you started on your own. It doesn't refill on its own.
A pipeline is different. It refills because you built the thing that fills it. Two parts do most of that work.
Positioning people can repeat. Your old network vouched for you from memory. Strangers can't. If someone can't say in one sentence what you do and who it's for, the recommendation stops at "they're great" — which wins no one.
Visibility beyond your circle. The people who already know you are a fixed number. Growth lives with the people who don't, and they only find you if you're somewhere they can watch how you think.
The trap isn't that you did anything wrong. The first wave working is the very thing that convinces you nothing needs to change. Then it quietly runs dry, and it looks like the market cooled, when really the well just emptied.
Genuine question: how did your first three clients actually find you, and has that kept working?
#IndependentConsultant#Coaching#GoingIndependent#Positioning#PersonalBrand…more
Founder at Radi8 // Executive Coach // Host of the Inspiring Founders Podcast
· LinkedIn
·
For most people who go out on their own, the first clients come easy. A former colleague. Someone from the old company. A friend who says "you should talk to my boss." It feels like word of mouth is working, and it convinces you that you'll never need marketing.
Then, somewhere in year one or two, it goes quiet.
Here's what actually happened. Those first clients weren't a pipeline. They were accumulated goodwill — twenty years of people who already knew your work, converting all at once. A one-time asset. Every engagement draws it down, and nothing automatic puts new names in.
That's the real source of feast-or-famine: treating a finite stock of warm contacts like a renewable one.
Refilling the well takes three things.
Positioning people can repeat. "He's great" sends you nobody, because your network can't finish the sentence. Give them the version they can pass along: who you help, and with what.
Visibility beyond your circle. A public body of work lets strangers build trust the way your old colleagues did, by watching how you think over time.
A reason to be remembered this month. Staying quietly excellent means being quietly forgotten. Consistency keeps you on the list when someone's moment of need arrives.
Word of mouth remains the best way to win clients. Building the system that generates it is the actual work.
If you've made the leap: how long did your first wave of clients last, and what did you do when it slowed?
#IndependentConsultant#Coaching#GoingIndependent#ConsultingBusiness…more