E
Erika Sanneman
· LinkedIn
The Multilingual Mind helps schools and education teams close the gap between what they know they want to do and what their people actually have the time, training, tools, systems, and support to impl
I changed one thing about the way I use ChatGPT, and it changed what I get out of it.
When I say something vague or unfinished, I don't want it to decide what I must have meant and write a polished version. I want it to ASK me.
Sometimes I answer two questions and say, “No, that's enough. Let's move forward.”
Other times we keep going. One question leads to another, and suddenly I'm considering options I didn't even realize were options when I started.
I remember wanting to comment on a post about an experience that overlapped with my own in some ways, but differed in important others. I wanted to support what people were sharing without putting my own perspective in front of theirs.
My first thought was basically: how do I write the right comment?
But I had ChatGPT ask me questions instead.
What was I actually trying to accomplish? Was I hoping to add my perspective, or help their message reach more people? Did supporting the post require commenting at all?
We got to alternatives I hadn't originally considered: liking it, saving it, sharing the original message where appropriate. Supporting without making myself the center of the conversation.
I didn't end up with a better comment. I ended up reconsidering whether a comment was what I needed in the first place.
That experience keeps coming back to me as I think about AI in education.
There's also a new study, published October 23, of 83 university students using generative AI. The groups guided through structured question sequences showed more learning-monitoring behaviors, greater reported metacognitive awareness, and higher course scores than the free-questioning group. It's a small, nonrandomized study, and it can't tell us which part of the approach made the difference. Still, I'm interested in what it suggests we should study next.
I don't want AI to finish my thinking. I want it to help me see where that thinking can go.
And I want to be able to say “enough questions” and make my own decision.
How are we helping students stay in charge of their thinking when they use AI?